| Grading Criteria | Maximum Score | Contestant Score | Comments |
|
1. Abstract - clear and concise - scientifically correct - consistent with presentation | 10 | ||
| 2. Knowledge of subject - understands background, methodology statistics, and interpretation of results at level appropriate for undergraduate - answered questions well | 25 | ||
|
3. Subject Matter - relevance to animal agriculture - quality of research - appropriate for undergraduate level - soundness of conclusion - evidence of work done by student | 20 | ||
|
4. Organization - logical flow: e.g., intro > objectives > methods >results >conclusion - time allocation | 15 | ||
|
5. Presentation and Personal Attributes - enthusiastic, audible and good eye contact - choice of words, enunciation and grammar - professional manners and dress - shows practice and confidence | 15 | ||
|
6. Visuals - neat and easy to read - appropriate number | 15 | ||
| TOTAL | 100 | ||
| Evaluator's Name: | Student Rank: |