ABSTRACT Three approaches to predicting and understanding food intake by beef cattle are discussed and compared. Although many physiological factors are known to be involved in intake control, these are not sufficiently quantifiable to form an adequate basis for intake prediction. Prediction equations derived from observed effects of animal and feed factors on intake are useful within the range of conditions under which the data were collected, but they do not predict adequately outside this range. The concept of an intermediate approach to intake prediction and understanding is presented, suggesting that proportional deviations of resource supplies from the feed (e.g., energy, protein, fiber) from the animal's optimal supply (requirement) generate discomforts. These, when squared and added, yield a total discomfort signal, which the animal minimizes. The fact that feed intakes by individual animals fluctuate considerably from day to day provides a means whereby animals can assess whether an intake somewhat higher or lower than their current average intake will improve their well-being. Examination of intake data from beef cattle fed grass silage suggests that intake is controlled over a period of several days. It is concluded that different levels of understanding of the control of voluntary intake are needed for different reasons, and that no single approach will serve all purposes.
Implications
Beef cattle do not control their feed intake in order to achieve a constant intake of a single resource (energy, protein, fiber). This implies that a more sophisticated approach must be developed for formulation of optimal diets and feeding programs than those based on a few independent factors. However, attempts to invoke detailed physiological pathways immediately come up against lack of quantitative relationships and lack of understanding of how numerous hormonal and neural pathways interact. Therefore, the approach adopted here, in which factors of importance in the situation being considered are incorporated into models of total discomfort, may provide a conceptual framework for future developments that account for more of the variation in factors that control intake.
Key Words: Beef Cattle, Physiology, Prediction, Voluntary Intake
© 2003, by the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81(E. Suppl. 2):E139-E144
| Search PubMed MEDLINE and PubMed are registered trademarks of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. |