ABSTRACT Pig production efficiency is the result of the responses of individual animals. However, experimental results are usually interpreted on the basis of mean animal responses with little emphasis given to variation around the means. Animals with different genetic potentials may respond differently to treatments, which makes it difficult to translate average population responses into either individual animal responses or across populations having different variation between animals. Nutritional theories that form the basis of current pig models are all at the level of individual animals. The problem of how to integrate across individuals to obtain population predictions is rarely addressed. To illustrate the effect of between-animal variation on population responses to dietary treatments, a pig growth model that predicts voluntary feed intake from parameters that predict the potential rates of protein and lipid retention was used. Feed intake is limited only by the ability of pigs to lose heat. Maximum heat production was set to always be that of a pig growing to its potential on a standard, balanced diet. An individual animal is defined by assigning values to three genetic parameters: protein weight at maturity, the ratio of body lipid-to-protein at maturity and a rate parameter. The model was made stochastic by assigning variation to these parameters. Population responses to increasing levels of available protein intake indicated that the linear-plateau model used to represent protein responses for an individual pig is compatible with the curvilinear response observed in experiments on populations. Increasing the time over which individual animal responses were measured also increases the curvilinearity of the response. Variation between animals has little effect on population feed intake, but it decreased population protein deposition rate, daily gain, and feed conversion ratio. It is concluded that mathematical models designed to simulate populations responses to treatments need to integrate the effect of population variation on growth and performance.
Implications
Results indicate that the linear-plateau model used to represent the response to protein supply in growing pigs is consistent with the curvilinear response that may be observed in experimental conditions. The curvilinear response may result from the variation between experimental animals and from limitations on the experimental procedures used. Models designed to simulate population responses need to integrate the effect of population variation on growth performance. The results show that the response of a population to treatments will differ in magnitude and shape from that assumed for an individual animal. Stochastic models that properly represent populations are therefore needed. Allowing for population variation is essential when models are to be used to predict nutrient requirements or to economically optimize swine production systems. For these applications, recommendations are particularly sensitive to the magnitude and shape of the model response as was found here.
Key Words: Genetic Variation, Growth, Protein, Simulation Models
© 2003, by the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81(E. Suppl. 2):E178-E186
| Search PubMed MEDLINE and PubMed are registered trademarks of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. |