January 19, 2023

Interpretive Summary: Evaluation of growth performance, carcass characteristics, and methane and CO2 emissions of growing and finishing cattle raised in extensive or partial-intensive cow-calf production systems

Interpretive Summary: Evaluation of growth performance, carcass characteristics, and methane and CO2 emissions of growing and finishing cattle raised in extensive or partial-intensive cow-calf production systems

By: Zachary E Carlson, Levi J McPhillips, Rick R Stowell, Galen E Erickson, Mary Drewnoski, Jim C MacDonald

There are many reasons (i.e. drought, limited perennial forage, calving) for using intensive or partially intensive production practices (e.g. drylotting or confinement) in a cow-calf enterprise. These practices may impact subsequent calf growth and feedlot performance. In addition, limited data are available comparing the environmental impacts (i.e., greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions) from different cow-calf production systems. This experiment evaluated the effects of a partial-intensive cow-calf production system on post-weaning calf growth performance, carcass characteristics, and GHG emissions. Calves from the partial-intensive cow-calf system had improved growth compared to calves from the extensive cow-calf system during the grower phase. During finishing, calves from the partial-intensive cow-calf system had poorer growth performance resulting in calves from the partial-intensive cow-calf system requiring an additional 27 d on feed to reach finish as calves from the traditional cow-calf system. These differences are likely due to compensation from lower gain periods resulting in better gain in the subsequent growth period. Cow-calf production system did not alter methane and carbon dioxide emissions per kilogram of intake. However, because calves in the partial-intensive cow-calf system required additional days on feed, absolute methane and carbon dioxide emissions were greater per animal for the partial-intensive cow-calf system compared to the extensive cow-calf system suggesting that reducing days to market may reduce emissions from beef systems.

Read the full article in the Journal of Animal Science.