Interpretive Summary: Nutritional composition of beef: a comparison of commercial North American grass- and grain-finishing systems
By: Joseph V Varre, Travis Statham, Autumn F Smith, Muhammad Ahsin, Jennifer Cloward, Marina Carbonell Herrera, Camille Mittendorf, Chyanne Crompton, Robert E Ward, Tiffany Evans, Troy Bird, Shawna Lyons, Amanda Pinelli, Dan Kittredge, Stephan van Vliet
The Beef Nutrient Density Project analyzed more than 300 beef samples from North American farms and supermarkets to see how grass- and grain-fed systems affect nutrients in meat, particularly fatty acids and minerals. On average, grass-fed beef contained higher amounts of omega-3 fatty acids and minerals, such as iron, calcium, copper, and selenium, especially when cattle were rotationally grazed and finished on pastures with a wide variety of plants. However, there was substantial variation within both systems. Some grain-fed samples had omega-3 and mineral levels that overlapped with or were higher than grass-fed samples, particularly when feedlot diets used less grain and shorter finishing periods and when grass-fed cattle grazed less plant-diverse pastures. These findings highlight the complexity of beef nutrition and suggest that simplified labels like “grass-fed” or “grain-fed” may not fully capture nutritional differences. Providing more detailed information on nutrient content (for example, front-of-package labeling of omega-3 content and/or an omega-6 to omega-3 ratio) could help consumers make informed choices. Producers can use our study insights to refine management practices associated with elevated concentrations of omega-3 fatty acids and minerals in beef.
Read the full article in the Journal of Animal Science.